Science Falsely So Called legitimate science is always behind the Bible! Science has repeatedly evidenced by using tests on ACTUAL dinosaur bones, that dinosaurs lived tens-of-millions of years ago That means this particular plant eater was alive about , years after the mass extinction event many paleontologists believe wiped all non-avian dinosaurs off the face of earth, forever. Heaman and colleagues used a new direct-dating method called U-Pb uranium-lead dating. A laser beam unseats minute particles of the fossil, which then undergo isotopic analysis. This new technique not only allows the age of fossil bone to be determined but potentially can distinguish the type of food a dinosaur eats. Living bone contains very low levels of uranium but during fossilization typically less than years after death bone is enriched in elements like uranium. The uranium atoms in bone decay spontaneously to lead over time and once fossilization is complete the uranium-lead clock starts ticking. The isotopic composition of lead determined in the hadrosaur’s femur bone is therefore a measure of its absolute age.
Carbon dating vs Bible Dating?
Some DCC locomotives feature on-board sound effects. A layout can be divided into blocks powered separately. Locomotives located by the power they use.
Feb 12, · If you learned about radiometric dating from a textbook in school (like me), then you were likely taught geochronology as it was ~60 years ago, and in a simplified format: igneous rock cools to form crystals, single parent decays into single daughter element, crystal acts as a closed system, initial daughter concentration is known, decay rate is known and constant, etc.
How accurate are carbon-dating methods? All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: Rate of Decay It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time. This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound. However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements. Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.
Thus radioactive dating relies purely on assumptions. We could put forward the following counter arguments to the constancy of these assumptions: The current high rate of entry might be a consequence of a disturbed post-Flood environment that altered the carbon to carbon ratio. Pre-Flood dates would thus have to be discarded.
Some scientists argue that the magnetic field of the earth has declined over time. Carbon comes from nitrogen and is independent of the carbon reservoir.
Does Radiometric Dating Prove the Earth Is Old? – Answers in Genesis
Helium Diffusion as a Creationist Clock By Michael Ward Scientists use certain elements present in a certain abundance to calculate an approximate age for rocks. One of the decay ratios used is Uranium decaying through a series of alpha and beta decays to Lead. The number in superscript preceding the element name indicates the atomic mass, the sum of its protons and neutrons. Alpha decay releases a Helium nucleus two protons and two neutrons from the parent atom to create two atoms: Using the amount of the remaining Uranium, the amount of Lead that has built up, and the original amount of Lead which is not created by any known decay process, scientists can calculate an approximate age based on the decay rate of Uranium and the ratios of Uranium to Lead and Lead to Lead.
Feb 23, · The basic themes of uranium ore genesis are host mineralogy, reduction-oxidation potential, and porosity. Uranium is a highly soluble, as well as a radioactive, heavy metal. It can be easily dissolved, transported and precipitated within ground waters by subtle changes in oxidation : Geofemtz.
Calendar Months Most newspaper article events happen anywhere from days, to months, to years before they reach publication. Consequently, most newspaper articles on this timeline are preceded by the date of the newspaper in which they appear. Detailed data source transcription for all news article quotes – this timeline – generally didn’t begin until A stellium represents a tremendous ending and new beginning, a concurrence of three or more cycles.
The past is lost, and a journey into a wide-open future follows. The next conjunction comes in over 13 centuries’ time in 3,
Age of the Universe
I have looked over quite a bit of stuff on that site and it really pains me to see how the truth is distorted and then presented as fact. As a scientist, I am appalled by the deliberate misstating of those facts that are presented as actual science to children who want to learn about the world as it really is.
The fact that they are starting with the conclusion means it is not science, no scientist would ever do something like that. When you do, it is called “confirmation bias”, which basically means you twist the evidence to prove something right even if it is not and you throw out all the other evidence that doesn’t fit with what you are trying to prove. What real scientists do is examine the evidence and go where it takes you, even if it isn’t a conclusion you like.
In real science you can’t say something is true just because you want it to be.
Carbon | Answers in Genesis Tue, 24 Apr GMT Carbon dating is a method, based on unprovable assumptions about the past, used to date things that contain carbon (e.g.
For example, when you ask an evolutionist how they come up with the age of the sedimentary layers in the earth, they will always tell you they date them by the fossils found in those sedimentary layers. But how can that be? How can the rocks date the layers, if the layers date the rocks? The evolutionist agrees with Darwin and says all life on earth evolved from primordial soup, which then somehow formed into many different species like birds, animals, plants, fish etc; and those birds, animals, plants and fish evolved into many different types of species themselves.
For example, they believe a bird later formed different types of lizards, horses and dogs. They also believe that plants created everything from vines to trees to flowers, and fish evolved into dinosaurs, apes and humans. Scientific fact is, we still have many of the old species among us, and we know of many that did in fact become extinct. But not a single bird has been found that used to be a fish.
Framework Hypothesis In debunking the above theories, the authors applied several key lenses as modes of inquiry to test the validity of these theories and any proposed theories. The last post already started to examine each aspect point by point. Image via Wikipedia 4. Dinosaurs did not live with people? Before God created man and woman, God created the varieties of air, sea, and land animals.
Air and sea creatures that breathed were created, followed by land animals.
Carbon 14 dating puzzle answers to solve this puzzle it is necessary carbon 14 dating problems to review the assumptions dates of carbon 14 dating puzzle answers the same value are expected answers in genesis carbon dating in creation theory but.
Leibnitz reworked Descartes’s cosmogony. Protogea was published much later in An essay toward a Natural History of the Earth. Woodward came down fairly strongly for the view that the flood was an act of God that could not be accounted for by normal physical processes. He also postulated hydrological sorting to account for the ordering of fossils.
Whiston added comets to Burnet’s cosmogony as the source of the waters of the flood. Lectures and Discourse of Earthquakes and Subterranean Eruptions. Hooke believed that the fossils were the remains of extinct species and could not be accounted for by the Flood. Using Descartes’s cosmology, the assumption that the earth was once entirely flooded, and the observation that the sea level was dropping three inches per century near his home, he calculated the age of the earth to be greater than 2 billion years.
Observation sur la Formation des Montagnards Pallas made extensive observations of Russian mountains. He observed the results of processes that acted on mountains, e.
Do Varves, Tree-Rings, and Radiocarbon Measurements Prove an Old Earth?
How old is the earth? First published in Refuting Evolution , Chapter 8 Evolutionists fallaciously think that billions of years of time makes particles-to-people evolution possible. So Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science presents what it claims is evidence for vast time spans.
Andrew A. Snelling, (Hons), Ph.D. (Geology) was for many years Geologist, Senior Research Scientist and Editor of the CEN Technical Journal (now Journal of Creation) at Creation Science Foundation (now Creation Ministries International), Brisbane, Australia.
Obviously, this is all quite rational and well-founded logic, especially for AiG. Personally, I agree with it percent. The problem is that this position directly contradicts a fundamental tenet of the young-earth creationist worldview. You see, YEC outfits like AiG explicitly reject the scientific principle of uniformitarianism , which holds that the natural laws and processes we see at work in the present day operated in much the same way in the past.
This makes perfect sense, to assume, for example, that things like the speed of light or the decay rates of radioactive isotopes , which have always proven to be reliably constant through countless observations and experiments over decades of scientific inquiry, were also constant in the decades and centuries and millenia before we started measuring them. But though this makes intuitive sense, AiG cannot accept it. To affirm uniformitarianism would be to acknowledge the fatal flaws in their own worldview, namely, that the evidence effectively and overwhelmingly makes it impossible for the universe to be as young as they and their literal interpretation of Genesis say it is.
All the dating techniques are based on assumptions, and the main assumption is the constancy of the process rates used to calculate those ages. Since that assumption is used in all the dating techniques of geology, cosmology, and physics, then if that assumption is wrong, then so are all the dates. In order for the idea of a 6, year-old universe to remotely begin to jibe with the available evidence , the laws of nature must be chaotic and unpredictable.
Did Adam and Eve Really Exist?
In May of , Answers in Genesis opened its high-tech and acclaimed Creation Museum and education center in the Cincinnati, Ohio, area on 70 scenic acres in Petersburg, Kentucky. In its first seven years, the museum attracted over two million guests. Ken cofounded AiG in with the purpose of upholding the authority of the Bible from the very first verse. In addition, he provides biblical and scientific answers to some of the most difficult questions people ask about the Christian faith:
These charts are excerpted from and used by permission of: © Answers in careful about going to this site as it is not a KJV site. Their info about creation vs. evolution is good, but their use of perversions of the Bible is not acceptable.
See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish People who ask about carbon 14C dating usually want to know about the radiometric  dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days?
Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. This only makes sense with a time-line beginning with the creation week thousands of years ago. It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years. We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods.
Questions and Answers from Genesis
Share by Mail The question of the meaning and proper interpretation of the early chapters of Genesis is one of the most heated subjects in Christendom today. Few other topics have evoked such polarised opinion and division. The diversity of views on Genesis, even among the most learned of exegetes and scholars, is staggering.
Andrew Snelling, a creationist geologist with “Answers in Genesis,” bluntly stated that it is “wrong for Gentry to go on denying and rejecting the many impeccable observational evidences ” Snelling ().
God places the cherubim, with a flaming sword, to guard the Tree of Life and Eden Gen. There is nothing in the Catechism that makes any teaching concerning original sin dependent on the sudden appearance of two immediately intelligent beings. Might we say that at some point in evolutionary history the mind of a being had the capacity to understand good and evil? Christianity and modern science are not at odds. To speculate otherwise, does no favor to either.
Dick Prudlo Here is the hoax presented as likely. Truth is at odds with what passes for science today, Jerd. And you fixation with this nonsense is clear. Augustine, allowed for metaphor in the Genesis story. It is undeniably packed with wisdom. One can continue to be informed by the story in the modern era, such as the warning about thoughtlessly succumbing to advertising.